New University of Southern California Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences/Los Angeles Times Poll

Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, in conjunction with American Viewpoint, conducted this survey on behalf of the University of Southern California Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and the Los Angeles Times. The latest poll shows:
|
Key Findings
Frequency Questionnaire
Crosstabs
While progress on immigration and guns in Washington is uncertain at best, Californians are anything but ambivalent on these issues. Overwhelming majorities of California voters support comprehensive immigration reform—including a path to citizenship—as well as measures to help prevent gun violence, according to the new University of Southern California Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, and Los Angeles Times statewide poll, conducted by Greenberg Quinlan Rosner and American Viewpoint.
Among the findings:
|
Articles
March 24
Across age, race and political party, broad support in CA for immigration plan that includes path to citizenship - USC dornsife
Most Californians favor citizenship path for illegal immigrants - LA Times
March 23
California Voters Not Supportive of New Taxes - USC dornsife
California voters split on Jerry Brown school plans - LA Times
March 22
Lawmakers get higher marks, but support remains lax - LA Times
Californians Overwhelmingly Support Gun Control Measures - USC Dornsife
Californians show strong support for strict gun control measures - LA Times
March 21
Californians still anxious about economy, poll shows - LA Times
Methodology
Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research, in conjunction with American Viewpoint, conducted this survey on behalf of the University of Southern California Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and the Los Angeles Times.
These findings are based on a random sample survey of 1,501 (1,501 weighted) registered voters in the state of California, conducted from March 11th to 17th, 2013. Interviews were conducted by telephone using live interviewers from Interviewing Services of America. Voters were randomly selected from a list of registered voters statewide and reached on a landline or cell phone depending on the number they designated on their voter registration. Twenty percent of this sample was reached on a cell phone. Up to five attempts were made to reach and interview each randomly selected voter.
The study includes an oversample of Latino registered voters, with the total number of Latino voters interviewed at 473 (330 weighted). All interviews among known Latinos were carried out via telephone by bilingual Latino interviewers, and conducted in the preferred language of the survey respondent, English or Spanish. Overall, 38 percent of interviews among the known Latino sample were conducted in Spanish and 62 percent in English. The technique of using fully bilingual interviewers yields higher response and cooperation rates and is greatly preferred because it does not terminate calls with Spanish-language households and require a callback.
Upon completion of all interviewing, the results were weighted to bring the Latino oversample population into line with the racial and ethnic composition of registered voters in California. The data were weighted to reflect the total population of registered voters throughout the state, balancing on regional and demographic characteristics for gender, age, race, and party registration according to known census estimates and voter file projections.
The maximum sampling error for the overall sample of 1,501 registered voters is +/- 2.9 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level. Margin of error for subgroups is higher. The margin of error for the 473 Latino sample respondents is +/- 4.9 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.

